[Link]
All I can think, really, is “But, why?” When I first saw this commercial for Tilda’s basmati rice, it set off an alarm in my brain somewhere, and I still can’t figure out exactly why. At face value, I didn’t see anything wrong with it.
The commercial starts with a couple in an Indian restaurant, and the man orders a side of basmati rice. The chef realizes there is no more, and dials a number to (presumably) Victorian England. Then, we are taken on a journey past the seas to India, where all the basmati rice is found. The tagline at the end of the commercial is “Tilda legendary rice: stolen from the past.”
Certainly, it’s a well-done commercial, and is extremely visually appealing. That said, a lot of the imagery invoked is of India’s colonial past, and I don’t know why this was necessary. The line at the end is what bothers me the most. “Stolen From The Past” calls to mind the European explorers and spice merchants who ‘brought’ pieces of the ‘East’ to Europe, for the aristocracy to enjoy. (The East India Company, anyone?) European, and more specifically British, colonialism is romanticized. Yep, order yourselves a plate of Tilda basmati, and it will be just like the good old days?
Again, why? Please enlighten me if you can.
